San Francisco

Impact at Epicenter Cafe

by sarah on March 29, 2010

Carrotmobs are about lots of things… voting with your dollars, building strong communities, supporting responsible businesses, and revolutionizing what activism can mean. But, at the center of it all, is creating change. And so we thought you all might like to know the real impact that you had at Epicenter Cafe, site of the September 10, 2009 Carrotmob.

photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/premshree/ / CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

We checked-in with Mark from Epicenter to get a finalized update of the changes they made in response to our mob. Here’s a summary of what he told us:

-Completed an overhaul of the HVAC (heating ventilating air conditioning) unit, allowing more efficient temperature control of the cafe. Because of the glass frontage, this has traditionally been a challenge for Epicenter.

-Instituted an 8% discount for people using travel mugs.

-Started sourcing a greater percentage of food supplies from local and more responsible vendors, including Fish from Wild Planet and others, Meat from Zoe’s, Produce from Rainbow and others, Bread from Panorama.

-Completed an energy audit and consulted with lighting experts, both yielding positive results.

-Transitioned from disposable wooden stir sticks to washable spoons.

-Implemented a front-of-the-house compost/recycle/landfill bin system.

-Joined the Green Cafe Network, complying with all GCN standards.

-Joined SF’s Green Business Program to get certified as a Green Business by the city.

Nice work, San Francisco. These changes at Epicenter happened because YOU all showed up and voted with your dollars. Stop in at Epicenter, grab a coffee, and check out the impact you had.

Category: SOMA Cafes

Opening up this blog

by Brent on September 15, 2009

Hey guys, just wanted to give a heads up that these city-based blogs are designed to be shared by all organizers who are planning Carrotmob events in a city. Here at Virgance HQ we just planned this most recent event, but the next campaigns in SF are going to be planned by other local organizers who aren’t part of Virgance. We’re giving them accounts, so soon you’ll start seeing blog posts from them as well, and they will introduce themselves and their campaigns. Just wanted to give you a heads up that this was happening!

Category: SOMA Cafes

Epicenter Carrotmob Recap

by Brent on September 14, 2009

Thanks to everyone who came out to the Carrotmob at Epicenter! It was more fun than a barrel of monkeys, as they say. I finally got some stats from Epicenter on about how much we spent: If you compare what Epicenter takes in on a normal Thursday between 5 and 10pm, and what we spent between 5 and 10pm we spent 996% (10x) of what they would usually get! Which is great, since at the first event we spent more like 300% of their usual take. In fact, Epicenter reports that this was the biggest night of spending in the history of their business! That makes me happy. Of course our total spending amount was much less than the first event, as expected, since people were buying totally different (cheaper) products, and the crowd wasn’t the same (as I’ll discuss below). And remember, the impact of the event is posted here. Now let us recap!

Let’s See How We Did!

So, when we designed this campaign, the goal was to try out some new things, and experiment so we could get an idea of what works and what doesn’t when you’re planning a Carrotmob. You can read our full post on this from July here. Let us now return to the 6 research questions we put forth, and see how we did….here they are:

1. What happens when you allow the public to vote for the winner of a Carrotmob?
2. What happens when you use qualitative value judgments to decide who wins a Carrotmob event instead of simple quantitative measures?
3. Is a campaign necessarily weakened when the mob spends relatively smaller amounts of money?
4. How does reputation compare to cash in terms of importance for a coffee shop?
5. How does a campaign on a weekday with no afterparty compare to a campaign on a Sunday followed by a free concert in Dolores Park?
6. Will people vote for those businesses who have not made change, or those who have already made change?

1. What happens when you allow the public to vote for the winner of a Carrotmob?

The people I’ve talked to about this seem to have a bit of a consensus that people voted not just for the actions the cafes would take, but also for the people. People have even told me that they thought the Carrotmob event would have a bigger impact if Cafe Madeleine had won, but they voted for Epicenter anyway because they loved Mark and Chris, and wanted to reward them for what they had done. I’m actually quite satisfied with the impact of this event, because as this blog post explains in detail, Epicenter really is doing an awful lot, and they’re doing it enthusiastically. But nevertheless, this really underscores that when you let people vote for a campaign, there are two different actions they are taking. First, there’s the initial vote for who wins. Second, there’s the act of showing up and spending money. In the act of voting, the only thing you’re being asked to do is choose who you like, so there may not be as much critical thinking going on. But when you’re asked to spend money at the event, you think more about the impact. I got more people questioning me during the event about what Epicenter was going to do than I did during the entire voting process. So while I think that the democracy was good just for the sake of democracy, and also good for getting people engaged, I’m not sure that the wisdom of the crowds is always going to be better than a panel of experts at determining who should win. It really comes down to whether your goal is to maximize the measurable impact of the campaign, or to do what the community feels most warm and fuzzy about. Both are OK. This decision should be left with the organizer in each community. But the next time I plan an event, I am not necessarily going to put it to a vote.

2. What happens when you use qualitative value judgments to decide who wins a Carrotmob event instead of simple quantitative measures?

I guess I already sort of addressed this one. I think I prefer the quantitative approach whenever it’s practical. We don’t have time to be wishywashy on our effectiveness. However, sometimes it’s impractical to do anything but a qualitative approach. I expect that will be true as we scale up and deal with businesses that have more complex supply chains and logistics and so on. When it’s really apples vs oranges, a qualitative approach (and democracy) feel a bit more appropriate.

3. Is a campaign necessarily weakened when the mob spends relatively smaller amounts of money?

No. A smaller group of people spending smaller amounts of money felt different…it didn’t feel like as much of a circus, and in a way it wasn’t quite as exhilarating, but it accomplished what we set out to accomplish. I’ll elaborate in the next question…

4. How does reputation compare to cash in terms of importance for a coffee shop?

What’s important here is what the expectations were for the event. My expectations were to answer these 6 research questions. Epicenter had a few goals of their own in mind:

- They wanted to promote awareness about their cafe
- They wanted to promote the fact that they can have a vibrant evening scene, which their daytime customers might not have known about.
- They wanted an event that went smoothly, was well-organized and safe
- They wanted some free press exposure

At no point did they set specific goals for revenue. They wanted reputation more. And we wanted to see what would happen with a campaign that was based on reputation. So we nailed those 4 bullet points, and in general Epicenter is happy with the results. At first we worried that they may have stocked up on too much perishable food in anticipation of the onslaught, but after checking it out, we actually did a pretty good job of eating their food, although they have a little extra fish. They also would have made more cash if they hadn’t staffed as many people that night. Better safe than sorry, but they could have gotten by with one or two fewer hands on deck. But Mark put this in perspective, explaining that they have looked at different types of advertising before, and this event got them an immense amount of free, positive “advertising” that they didn’t have to pay a dime for. So we have successfully provided precisely the type of value that they wanted most!

5. How does a campaign on a weekday with no afterparty compare to a campaign on a Sunday followed by a free concert in Dolores Park?

I think this campaign was very different from the first. It’s funny, because the nature of the event changed since I first posed this question. In July I thought we would be having an event in the morning and throughout the day, and that people who worked downtown would rally their officemates to come grab a cup of coffee. Instead, Epicenter ended up winning, and they serve food and alcohol in the evening, so they were excited about doing an evening event. Furthermore they were too far from the morning commute to be a practical choice for people looking to quickly grab their morning coffee. Suddenly, the event went from being an event with no afterparty to being an event which was entirely an afterparty for the workday. So the party atmosphere was actually similar to that of campaign #1. However, I think doing the event on a weeknight was actually a big roadblock that prevented people from coming. A lot of people have a tight schedule of things they need to accomplish after work, and this event wasn’t particularly convenient for people who have to get home for other things.

6. Will people vote for those businesses who have not made change, or those who have already made change?

Touched on this one above.

Now, time to tackle a couple big questions:

QUESTION 1: Why did fewer people show up to this event than the last one?

In the first event, the Facebook event had 116 people who said “yes”, 68 “maybes”, and probably 400+ people showed up. This time we had 188 who said “yes” and 197 “maybes”, yet far fewer people showed up. For the sake of science I went through all my Facebook friends who RSVP’d “yes”, to count how many of them actually showed up (I didn’t count anyone affiliated with Carrotmob or Virgance). Out of those friends who said they were coming, 12 people did show up and 31 people didn’t show up. So why? The worst answer to that question would be that people aren’t excited about coming to a Carrotmob. But I don’t think we have an enthusiasm problem at all. I think we didn’t make it easy enough for people. Here are a list of factors that may have prevented people from coming:

- the location was far away from public transportation
- the location was far away from where people live
- the location was far away from where people work
- thursday is a more difficult and busy day than sunday
- the evening is a more difficult time than early afternoon
- people were tired from work
- some of the novelty could have worn off after the first event
- people didn’t see a direct connection between how much money they spent and the change that would result

Here are a couple factors that were NOT responsible for a smaller turnout:

- promotion. many thousands of people knew about this event. way more people than knew about the first event. we were in all sorts of email lists and tweets. this wasn’t the problem.
- people not liking the cafe. everyone is absolutely nuts for Epicenter Cafe. people love it.

So, my guess is that the biggest factor was the location, and the second biggest factor was that it was scheduled for dinner time on a thursday after a long day at work. That’s my take. What do you think? So if that’s true, then we’ve learned that weekends are probably better, unless we have a low-impact way to fit into peoples’ daily routines a little better.

QUESTION 2: How successful was this event?

There are different ways to define success. Here’s how I think we did for each one:

Did the event have a big impact?
Yes.

Did the business make a lot of money?
They had a very good night, but it had potential to be better. But we didn’t design this event to maximize spending.

Did the business enhance their reputation?
Yes. This was the top goal, and it was a huge success. Of course, the effect of this has to be judged over time. We’ll see what the extra impact of the press is once it comes out…

Did people enjoy participating and have fun?
Yes! People actually had more fun at this one than they did at the first one, mainly because we got rid of the line. The line made for a great video, but it wasn’t sustainable. This event was fun, and sustainable.

Did we spread the message about Carrotmob?
Yes! We were all over the place, and more press yet to come….

Was it safe, and did we avoid problems?
Bingo.

Was it simple to plan?
No. It was an elaborate event, from filming all the videos of the cafes to having plans for how to keep a long line entertained. I don’t regret making it complex, because it was definitely worth everything we learned from it. But I wish I didn’t spend so much time figuring out a totally unnecessary “security plan” to submit to the SFPD. We were ready for a lot more than we needed to be ready for. Which is, of course, the smartest way to plan an unpredictable event.

Did we learn from it as we were hoping to?
YES!

So all in all I would call the event a big success by most measures. The bottom line is that I designed a campaign that succeeded in all the big ways I had planned for it to succeed. At the same time, I didn’t design this campaign to have a huge line, and as a result I feel a little blah about it, since I realized that I wanted a huge line. The takeaway from this is that long lines make organizers feel good. But since Carrotmobs should be designed to benefit the consumers and the businesses, I think it’s best if I get over my desire for a crazy line in every campaign. This campaign compelled Epicenter to make great changes, and rewarded them with exactly what they wanted. A long line can be a valuable gimmick to help an event “make a splash”, but as this movement matures, the idea of shooting for a long line will become increasingly gimmicky and unnecessary. I’m starting to get used to that idea.

Let’s make sure that what Epicenter did for Carrotmob is never forgotten. When you go there, tell them Carrotmob sent you. And if you appreciate what Epicenter has done, they will probably appreciate a nice review on Yelp. Show love!

Mission accomplished.

Category: SOMA Cafes

Tangible Results

by Brent on September 9, 2009

It’s the night before Carrotmob, and I thought I would put up one more post to clarify what exactly is going on at Epicenter Cafe, and why we are going to use our consumer power to make them rich tomorrow.

(EVENT INFO IS HERE)

We are doing this because Carrotmob and Epicenter have made a deal: Epicenter spends time and money becoming as sustainable as possible, and in exchange, Carrotmob shows up to make them as profitable as possible.

Things that Epicenter Café already offered before Carrotmob:

- Direct relationship, fair trade, organic, bird-friendly coffee
- Porcelain cups to reduce the waste of disposable cups
- Water dispensers to discourage disposable bottled water use
- Locally-made organic food
- A grease trap installed to minimize run-off
- A waste sorting system for recycling and composting everything in the kitchen
- A lighting system based on CFLs and low-voltage halogen

Things that Epicenter Café has done so far because they won the Carrotmob:

- Created a new 8% price discount for people who bring their own mugs/cups
- Put in new customer-facing 3-color trash cans
- Joined Green Café Network
- Put in a dirty / clean spoon system to replace the wooden stir sticks at the condiment counter (this mostly helps people who take their drinks to go and use wooden sticks.  “For here” orders already get metal spoons with their ceramic cups).
- Pursued an energy audit. Basic results were that the lighting is already as efficient as possible, but there are a few other things that can be explored.

Additional changes that Epicenter Café is still working on:

- Becoming a SF certified green business (takes several months)
- They explored biodegradable plastics as promised, and the Carrotmob voted that they shouldn’t use anything corn-based. – They are currently researching potato-based “spudware”.
- They are also deep in research of options for using more post-consumer paper. With both the paper and the spudware they have laid out a budget for it and are currently getting bids from 4 different vendors.
- They are also having a HVAC specialist come out to see whether the HVAC system can be improved.

So there you have it. Perhaps if you buy one extra drink they’ll spring for a windmill. See you tomorrow.

Category: SOMA Cafes

Tell Your Friends!

by Brent on August 27, 2009

Here’s the best page to distribute as you tell your friends about the next Carrotmob: http://sf.carrotmob.org/epicenter/

RSVP here on Facebook, and invite your friends: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=119381212029

Bring your whole office. Best happy hour ever.

Category: SOMA Cafes

Update on what Epicenter is going to do

by susanna on

Following up on the last post about PLA, there’s no final decision yet, but it’s looking like the mob doesn’t want Epicenter to switch to PLA. So we thought it would be good to do a quick review. Epicenter is already very green, but they can do more. Mark and beers

Here’s what Epicenter Café is going to do now that we’re making them rich:

  • Join the Green Café Network
  • Get a complete energy audit from SF Energy Watch
  • Increase their use of post-consumer paper products
  • If enough money is raised, they’ll also try to:

  • Improve their HVAC system
  • Go completely plastic-free
  • And just to show their love to you:

  • Begin giving customers a discount for bringing their own mug
  • Again, while these are great things, it seems like most people wanted to come and mob Epicenter as a thank you for all the other things they’ve already done. Let’s show the world how much we value these responsible business practices!

    Category: SOMA Cafes

    To PLA or not to PLA…

    by susanna on August 18, 2009

    What is the most sustainable type of take-out packaging?

    Ah yes, the burning question that keeps many an environmentalist tossing and turning well into the night. On the one hand, PLA, aka “polylactic acid” comes from plants, not petroleum, so it must be good, right? But which plants does it come from? And what part of the plant? Is it waste being upcycled? Is it replacing food crops? It must be good, right, it’s not petroleum!?

    Epicenter Café, being a very conscientious Carrotmob winner, wants to be sure they make the right choice. They also want your input, sage readers. So I present to you the options, because even the Green Café Network does not take an official stance on this ever-evolving topic. There is an increasing array of options for eco to-go containers.

    fritataWhile Epicenter already encourages people to stay and enjoy their meal or coffee amid their wonderful ambience, they know that sometimes you simply have to eat at your desk. Hopefully artistry such as this frittata will survive the trip to the office! So I present to you a selection of eco packaging, all of which claim to be competitively priced. We leave it to you to decide what issues matter most to you when considering your take-away packaging.

    According to Patagonia, the company long recognized as one deeply committed to sustainability, Corn PLA is “…a technology that may irrevocably alter the balance of life.” Now that’s a heavy charge to weigh on a material so many of us want to believe is better than plastic. Basically, the 2001 article explains that the only real reason they don’t like corn PLA is that at least 30% of the corn used is genetically engineered. At the time that was written, corn wasn’t yet claiming to be the holy grail of sustainability and thus pricing it out of reach for over 2/3rds of the planet’s populace.

    But this is about food packaging, so why is corn PLA better than plastic? (In the US, due to our government subsidies, corn is much cheaper than other dextrose sources such as cane and beet sugar) Well, the first argument is that it reduces our dependency on oil. Which matters, since we will run out at some point. Patagonia is able to use recycled plastic, but the FDA approves recycled content for food packaging on a case-by-case basis, as the technology develops, to ensure food safety and not hinder innovation.
    This blog post lists the pros and cons of corn PLA, which comes from the kernels, not the cobs. You can read more about it from the primary US manufacturer, Cargill.

    So what are the alternatives?

    misc_food1This article from Ecopreneurist January 2008 touts packaging made from sugarcane waste.

    The founder of the company touted, Stalk Market, explains what he’s doing to make his products as sustainable as possible.

    Here’s a 100% recycled PET that’s recently been approved by the FDA: PPI The good thing about this, is it’s turning non-biodegradable waste into something useful.

    I was hard-pressed to find articles about potato-ware, but according to a manufacturer in New Zealand, it’s made from waste starch, not the potatoes we actually eat. This distributor doesn’t specify what type of vegetable starch they use, but it’s in the US: Vegware

    So what do you think?

    What sort of take-out containers should Epicenter Café use?

    • corn kernel (PLA) (21.0%, 5 Votes)
    • potato starch (21.0%, 5 Votes)
    • 100% recycled PET (petroleum) (17.0%, 4 Votes)
    • recycled paper (17.0%, 4 Votes)
    • sugarcane waste (13.0%, 3 Votes)
    • something else (tell us what in the comments) (13.0%, 3 Votes)

    Total Voters: 24

    Loading ... Loading ...

    Category: SOMA Cafes

    Meet Mark, and his beers

    by susanna on August 14, 2009

    This is Mark Harris, co-owner of Epicenter Café. Mark and his partner Chris have worked hard to make Epicenter as sustainable as possible. And they’re ready to take it up a notch! They’re interested in joining the Green Café Network to help them become even greener.

    While we were talking to Mark about the event logistics, we learned they also have a great selection of beer & wine, plus an off-site license. So we thought it’d be best to do this as a happy hour. For those of you who need to grab n’ go, they are licensed to sell you that six-pack of Trappist monk brew you’ve been craving to crack open at home.

    Here is Mark, proudly displaying his awesome selection of craft brews and fine wines. September 10th may be the happiest happy hour he’s ever hosted…
    Mark and beers

    Here is Mark’s specials board- they’re not just about drinking at Epicenter, I’ve had a couple of tasty lunches there myself. In fact, just today I spied the lead organizer of SF Carrotmob 3 toiling away on a big paper due today. She says it’s a great place to study.
    Epicenter specials board

    Category: SOMA Cafes

    Epicenter Café Carrotmob! Thurs September 10th

    by susanna on August 4, 2009

    That’s right, we have a date! But sadly, we must wait.

    …Until after Burning Man, when San Francisco comes back to life! Yesterday Brent and I had a great strategy session with Mark, the co-owner of Epicenter, and we’re really stoked about this event! Time will fly, and you’ll be glad you had enough of it in order to tell all your friends!

    The details are:

    Epicenter Café 764 Harrison St. San Francisco, CA 94107
    Carrotmobbing from 5PM to 8PM, party continues until 10PM

    Save the Date! Thursday September 10th

    We promise we won’t make you wait in line forever like last time! We have some great things planned to make it fun and easy! As the date gets closer, we’ll post more details.

    Category: SOMA Cafes

    by curtis on July 26, 2009

    The voting has ended!  Congratulations to Epicenter Cafe for winning the most votes and becoming the official business for our SOMA Carrotmob event!  More information on the voting can be found here, and stay tuned for more details on the date and time of the event!!

    Category: SOMA Cafes
    Next Page »